| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. What am I doing wrong? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Most of the things have been said by the posters above, but I can also recommend Sister Alitura in the Arnon system. She will set you on a long epic SoE arch, a chain of 50 missions that will take you through high-sec empire space. It's worth doin...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.07 10:52:00
|
162. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Maliatida wrote: Why bother having a tournament at all then? Just randomly generate a winner. ATX, Alliance Raffle Tournament. Not to be the devil's advocate, but there are cases just after this first weekend in which several teams are t...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 20:47:00
|
163. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: A simple random number broke ties that we did not have a rule to call. I see. CCP Veritas wrote: We're most certainly not going to revamp the entire ranking rules once the tournament is underway That, I can under...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 20:43:00
|
164. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: Official rankings are up: http://community.eveonline.com/en/tournament/rankings Thanks, but a disappointment. May I ask what the determining factor was to rank the tie-breakers? The speed in which they completed the ga...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 19:50:00
|
165. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Corine Noas wrote: You might wanna try to look from the other side: say, Team A defeats team B 50:0 Team C defeats team D 50:20 This means team D played their matchup better than team B (against equal 50p gained teams) -> team D is overall ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 17:56:00
|
166. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Karl Planck wrote: however, on the flip side this rule makes it so that teams like ECM teams, which are usually all or nothing teams less incentive to play. That may or may not be the case, the problem with the current rule-set is that it ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 16:23:00
|
167. Slam dunks, surprises, and upsets - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Apathetic Brent wrote: You heard it here first, guys. If you're a member of the CFC you're good at small gang warfare, or supposed to be. No, no. Don't get me wrong. I know most CFC alliances are not accustomed to small gang warfare. But ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 15:47:00
|
168. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for the quote Veritas, but erhm.. CCP Veritas wrote: I'm working with the rules people to sort that all out. Can you tell the "rules people" that they need to drastically change the set-up for this? It just doesn't make sense to par...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 15:41:00
|
169. Slam dunks, surprises, and upsets - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Which of these teams were you most surprised to see fail so hard? Solar Fleet. The outcome wasn't that surprising considering the fact that they A: did not bring any ECCM, and B: were against a team heavily focused on ECM. I just hope...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 15:26:00
|
170. Games for next weekend. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I just wonder about something. IC has created a ranking list here , but what determines the positions of this list? There are 23 teams that have won a complete shutout victory in the past weekend. All of them should be tied, unless speed is a det...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.07.02 15:01:00
|
171. Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vincent VanDamme wrote: So, a bug was abused? This is a no brainer, isn't it? Actually, it's not that simple. If this case would ever be brought to a real-life court, the Goons would likely go free. The problem is that there is no decisi...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.22 09:17:00
|
172. Dazed and Confused - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Oy, talk about a wall of text. Alright, let's cut it down to pieces. And create a wall of text as answer Only your rookie ship is given back in case it's blown up. All other ships are not given back, but you can insure yourself and most of the...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.11 18:29:00
|
173. how long does it take for caldari to attack my attackers in lowsec? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
J'Poll wrote: Lol, bounties are broken You place a bounty on him, he will rol his alt out and POD himself and collect your money. Might aswel give him the money directly. This is, of course, assuming that the person has a second account...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.11 11:17:00
|
174. how long does it take for caldari to attack my attackers in lowsec? - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Titan, it's usually more dangerous to be in low-sec than to be in null-sec, despite the fact that low-sec is still officially empire space. The thing is. Low-sec is pirate territory. Player pirates that is. They are not large enough, or organized...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.11 11:11:00
|
175. SISI has new Minmatar textures - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for posting the pics everyone. I have to compliment CCP on a job well done. Minmatar ships always looked so, "rough". As in "Well, let's slam a plate here, a few reinforcements there and I still have some leftovers laying around which I wi...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.10 02:51:00
|
176. Courier contract profit - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Hey Pyramus, As a courier shipper myself, I have to say that it's a challenging market, but one that does allow you to get better at over time. I don't necessarily mean skils, although it does provide more safety if you can learn better defensiv...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.10 02:13:00
|
177. CCP needs to ban -5 or lower players from hi-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mmm, the nature of a sandbox game is to give players as much freedom as possible. Your idea would limit this for some players. I don't think its a good idea.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.06.07 11:23:00
|
178. returning pilot - in EVE New Citizens Q&A [original thread]
Mmm, there are loads of high-sec industrial corps out there. Look around in the recruitment section found here . Or post on that forum and see which corps & alliances respond to it. Welcome back.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.30 07:51:00
|
179. New Inventory, CCP Hellmar response wanted. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.26 12:41:00
|
180. New Inventory, CCP Hellmar response wanted. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kasriel, what you are asking for is understandable. You want an option to either turn on a Unified Inventory system or turn it off and it reverts back to the old system. I am no programmer or developer myself, but please be aware that what you ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2012.05.26 12:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |